Report of the week

Your epigenetic age comes with a margin of error nobody prints

A 2026 reliability study found that DNA methylation clocks are highly reproducible in the lab and considerably less stable in the person. That distinction matters enormously.

A laboratory pipette above sample wells, with a clock in the background.

2026-08-27  |  8 min read

Read the article

Beat
Consumer diagnostics
Method
Read the primary study
Standard
Report the error bars
Policy
No paid coverage

What we cover

Testing moved out of the clinic and into the shop. These three sections follow what that changed: the panels, the age estimates, and the rules.

Age estimates

Biological age

Epigenetic clocks, pace-of-ageing measures, and the reliability problem underneath both.

  • DNA methylation clocks
  • Pace-of-ageing measures
  • Test reliability
  • Clinical guidelines
Open biological age

Rules and gaps

Oversight and access

Who is allowed to sell a test, what gets reviewed before sale, and where the gaps sit.

  • Over-the-counter clearance
  • Laboratory-developed tests
  • Supplement regulation
  • Compounded products
Open oversight and access

Recently reviewed

Each piece gets re-read when new trial data lands. Filter by section to see what changed.

What we are working on

Stories in progress, with roughly where they stand. Vote to tell the desk what to prioritise.

Publishing soonAbout 1 week

Incidental findings from whole-body MRI screening

What happens after a scan finds something that was never going to hurt you.

Progress90%
In reviewAbout 2 weeks

How two labs produce different results from one sample

Assay platforms, calibration, and why cross-lab comparison of your own results is harder than it looks.

Progress78%
DraftingAbout 6 weeks

Multi-cancer early detection tests and the screening trade-off

Reading the trial designs behind the most heavily marketed new category in diagnostics.

Progress41%
ResearchingAbout 10 weeks

Reference intervals were built on populations that do not look like everyone

Population bias in the datasets that define normal, and what is being done about it.

Progress18%

Write for us

We publish clinicians, laboratory scientists, epidemiologists, and health policy researchers. Every submission is checked against the primary source.

Test performance

Sensitivity, specificity, reference intervals, and measurement error. The unglamorous statistics that decide whether a result means anything.

Interpretation

What a clinician does with a number, and where consumer reporting of the same number diverges from that.

Regulation and access

Clearance pathways, laboratory-developed tests, direct-to-consumer rules, and enforcement.

What we will and will not publish

  • Claims must trace to a named trial, review, registry entry, or regulator document.
  • Pieces run 1,200 to 2,500 words and say plainly where the evidence is thin.
  • No paid placements, no affiliate copy dressed as reporting, no brand-supplied claims.
  • Any commercial relationship, including free product, is disclosed in the byline.

Email the editors

Editors' picks

Longer pieces we keep sending people back to.